This is my opinion.. but as Gary already told you, if someone really wants to shoot himself in the food...
Ah, remember: I am _not_ preparing a package for clam! In the moment, I have only manual updates: I need to spend my time to make it wok, not to make it easy to install..Maybe in a future....
On 9/24/05, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So you're opening up a port on the firewall to a critical service which has
the potential to DoS the firewall for a feature that only a handful of IT
hobbyists might consider using?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Swartzendruber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 7:27 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] antivirus and etc
At 08:22 PM 9/23/2005, you wrote:
>Dan,
>
>You're opening up a real potential for DoSing the firewall if you have an
>especially busy Exchange server that gets hit by some mass mailer worm. I
>would rather have a separate instance of clamav running on my postfix (or
>whatever MTA you choose to love) box.
Well, I did say that was an option. That said, I'm not sure I buy
that. Keep in mind, the clamav instance running on pfsense will only
be as busy as the MTA makes it. Most non-enterprise MTAs (like mine)
will only allow a handful of inbound connections at a time, and until
the virus check is complete, no further smtp connections will be
allowed. I guess it's a decision to make depending on the CPU
horsepower available on firewall and mail server.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]