Yep that was you...  I appreciate all the help that night...  

Quick question for you/everybody.  Could this be a problem with my CF card?
The reason I say this is that I attempted to load and run .86.4 and got the
error now.  It's really getting out of hand <GRIN>!  Too many variables
floating around. 

I'm going to re-group and try it again.


Barry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 2:30 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92
> 
> My IRC/forum nick is hoba.
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Barry Kiesz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 7. November 2005 21:11
> > An: support@pfsense.com
> > Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92
> > 
> > 
> > This what I have and was able to reproduce this on 2 wrap 
> boxes (same 
> > CF card though).  I popped the CF card that had a pre.90 
> image on it 
> > and it booted on both wrap boards.
> > 
> > WRAP.1E v1.09
> >  640 KB Base Memory
> >  130048 KB Extended Memory
> >  512MB Kinston CF card
> > pfSense-Embedded-0.92.img.bin.gz
> > C:\Wrap>physdiskwrite.exe
> > physdiskwrite v0.5 by Manuel Kasper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > Could it be a format issue on my CF card?  Not knowing a whole lot 
> > about these, I'm just grabbing at straws
> > 
> > Thanks for any help..
> > 
> > 
> > Barry
> > 
> > P.S. Holger, What's you nic on the IRC channel?... 'Cause I 
> think you 
> > were the one helping me out last week.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 1:56 PM
> > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92
> > > 
> > > I have been using all versions of pfsense at my wrap with 
> 4 nics (3 
> > > on board, 1 atheros). I noticed random reboots on applying wlan 
> > > settings with pre .90 versions. This stopped with .90 and 
> never came 
> > > back. Actually I have been running .90, .90a, .92 (which 
> was pulled 
> > > due some issues) and I'm pretesting 0.93 atm (which is the first 
> > > release with the new
> > > freebsd6 release files). 0.93 runs pretty smooth and even 
> got faster 
> > > (webgui feels faster, +3 mbit throghput wan to lan). I 
> can confirm 
> > > the stability issues with wireless for pre .90 versions 
> but I never 
> > > had installationproblems or stability issues without 
> using wireless. 
> > > I'm running off from a 256 MB cf with the unmodified 128 MB image 
> > > written to it.
> > > Just in case you didn't notice or haven't followed it, there is a 
> > > tutorial for seting up the wrap at
> > > http://pfsense.com/index.php?id=36 .. I don't know if this is 
> > > helping you to get further, but I know quite a lot of 
> users from the 
> > > forums or the irc-channel using wraps without issues, even with 
> > > wireless nics (and I have 3 wrapsystems running 24/7 with 
> real live 
> > > conditions, 2 with wireless nics).
> > > If you still don't get it running please reply with bios 
> versions. 
> > > Maybe this only pops up with a special bios version? I 
> have plenty 
> > > of wraps to test with (beginning from 1D to 1E 
> hardwarereleases and 
> > > I'm about to order 10 more wraps tomorrow which should 
> have latest 
> > > hardwarerelease and bios versions when they arrive.
> > > 
> > > If someone is reading this and has a working wrap install please 
> > > reply with "it's working for me with pfsense 0.xx, wrap 1x, Bios 
> > > 1.0x. Also add if you are using a wireless nic or not (which 
> > > shouldn't prevent boot but it's nice to know;-) Maybe 
> we'll find a 
> > > matrix what systems are affected (if it's something like that and 
> > > there really is a bug with it).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Holger
> > > 
> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > Von: Barry Kiesz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Gesendet: Montag, 7. November 2005 18:30
> > > > An: support@pfsense.com
> > > > Betreff: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > This is most likely a newbie issue, but here goes..  This is 
> > > > actually a two part question/issue!
> > > > 
> > > > 1. For the past week I 've been trying to install a 
> fresh copy of 
> > > > Pfsense onto my wrap board.  I'm able to install and boot .88
> > just fine.  I
> > > > attempted to overwrite the image on on 512MB CF card 
> with .90 and 
> > > > first gave the error messages  (didn't save them) and ended on 
> > > > Boot prompt command.  I attempted to install again after 
> > > > downloading a fresh copy off of the mirrors and then it 
> would get 
> > > > to this, sit there for a while and
> > > then reboot:
> > > > 
> > > > WRAP.1E v1.09
> > > > 
> > > > Wisp-Router.com
> > > > Your Full Time Professionals
> > > > 
> > > > 640 KB Base Memory
> > > > 130048 KB Extended Memory
> > > > 
> > > > 01F0 Master 848A SAMSUNG CF/ATA
> > > > Phys C/H/S 999/16/63 Log C/H/S 499/32/63
> > > > -
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > So then I took a little break and waited for .92 to 
> come out and 
> > > > now I get this and it just hangs there
> > > > 
> > > > WRAP.1E v1.09
> > > > 
> > > > Wisp-Router.com
> > > > Your Full Time Professionals
> > > > 
> > > > 640 KB Base Memory
> > > > 130048 KB Extended Memory
> > > > 
> > > > 01F0 Master 848A SAMSUNG CF/ATA
> > > > Phys C/H/S 999/16/63 Log C/H/S 499/32/63 Copyright (c) 
> 1992-2005 
> > > > The FreeBSD Project.
> > > > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 
> > > > 1993, 1994
> > > >         The Regents of the University of California. All rights 
> > > > reserved.
> > > > FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov  4 02:53:05 UTC 2005
> > > >     
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/pfSense_wrap.6
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Fatal trap 1: privileged instruction fault while in kernel mode
> > > > instruction pointer     = 0x20:0xc086588c
> > > > stack pointer           = 0x28:0xc0c20d20
> > > > frame pointer           = 0x28:0xc0c20d68
> > > > code segment            = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
> > > >                         = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
> > > > processor eflags        = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
> > > > current process         = 0 ()
> > > > trap number             = 1
> > > > panic: privileged instruction fault
> > > > Uptime: 1s
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > #2 question and the reason for the upgrade.  I've been 
> having DHCP 
> > > > issues with pfsense.  I've tried m0n0wall and don't 
> seem to have 
> > > > any issues.  I really need to use pfsense for 2 reasons.  First 
> > > > the intferface is great and two, I have an Atheros  chipset on 
> > > > wirless card.  Once I get this back on up I'll pay more 
> attention 
> > > > to the log files to see what my problem is... As I've tried 
> > > > different PCs throughout this process.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Any help would be appreciated!!
> > > > \
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > Barry
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> > > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > ____________
> > > Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> additional 
> > commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> ____________
> Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to