Here is the enhanced log:
Dec 26 13:37:39 WAN 24.39.130.241.3129
24.39.185.78.445 ESP
Dec 26 13:37:36 WAN 24.39.130.241.3129
24.39.185.78.445 ESP
Dec 26 13:35:38 WAN 66.101.95.241:16246
24.39.185.78:1026 UDP
And here is the raw log:
Dec 26 13:37:39 pf: 2. 955773 rule 35/0(match):
block in on fxp1: 24.39.130.241.3129 >
24.39.185.78.445: S 452106698:452106698(0) win
16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
Dec 26 13:37:36 pf: 118. 730692 rule 35/0(match):
block in on fxp1: 24.39.130.241.3129 >
24.39.185.78.445: S 452106698:452106698(0) win
16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
Dec 26 13:35:38 pf: 53. 763178 rule 35/0(match):
block in on fxp1: 66.101.95.241.16246 >
24.39.185.78.1026: UDP, length 791
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
----- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] BETA1 error
reporting protocal in firewall logs
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 12-26-2005 1:37 pm
> Turn on raw logs and compare. Please show me a
line where it is matching false.
>
> My logs here only show TCP and UDP and some
ICMP.
>
> On 12/26/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I have notices since installing BETA1 that the
> > firewall logs report "NEARLY" everything as
ESP
> > protocol. I have hit the outside of pfS with
many
> > packets and nmap'd the outside interface and
all
> > reports as ESP protocol.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > David L. Strout
> > Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
