Exactly as you described would have to add an rdr rule for each NG interface would apply to the ftp proxy it seems. A problem I outlined on forums the other day.
Practically possible? because it sort of limits pppoe server if it is not. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 February 2006 21:23 To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] outbound nat on pppoe Aarrgh...ok, now we're really getting outside my realm of knowledge - especially w/out the code in front of me so humor me for a second (unless Scott is willing to jump in). The PPPOE server interfaces aren't individually setup are they? ie. you also can't apply rules to those interfaces? If that's the case, it sounds like we'll need to expose those as opt interfaces or something which would then allow for port redirection. Am I close? --Bill On 2/27/06, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep that is the problem. Sorry bad syntax on my behalf. > That is the problem. > > > You cannot port forward pppoe interface to a port. > > > We are not actually forwarding proxy info we are forwarding smtp > traffic. > > Sorry for the misunderstanding > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 February 2006 20:19 > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] outbound nat on pppoe > > Ahhh, you run the PPPOE server right? How about a port forward? > That's all the auto-redirect on lan to squid does. We should probably > make this part of the squid package and have an interface selection > for which interfaces to redirect. > > --Bill > > > On 2/27/06, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Physhical interface. > > > > Like redirect lan to squid server. > > Redirect all pppoe_clients to squid server > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 27 February 2006 15:00 > > To: support@pfsense.com > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] outbound nat on pppoe > > > > Wow, I ran that code for the better part of a year and didn't discover > > that :-/ I do recall having a /29 and making use of adv. outbound NAT > > though, but come to think of it, I wanted CARP so delegated PPPOE > > termination to the modem. Hmmm...Just to clarify (it's early and I > > haven't looked at the code) - you can't select the PPPOE (ng) > > interface or you can't select the physical interface? > > > > --Bill > > > > On 2/27/06, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There is no faculity in the nat to allow the interface pppoe > > configured > > > To nat outbound connections. Could someone suggest a change > > > > > > Alan Walters > > > Aillweecave Company Limited > > > Ballyvaughan Co Clare > > > Ph (00353) 65 7077 036 > > > Fax (00353) 65 7077 107 > > > Lo Call 1890 AILLWEE > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
