Ahhhh...excellent. That's how I THOUGHT it should work--by NAT instead of interface. Seems I'm not quite as lost as I thought. Any idea when it will be available for public consumption? Need testers? I got 2 non-critical FTPs on virtual IPs myself and a client with 2 offices, each with employee-only FTP on virtual IP.
--Bennett -----Original Message----- From: Peter Allgeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 3:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Passive FTP and Virtual IPs Am Donnerstag, den 20.07.2006, 11:10 -0500 schrieb Bennett: > It's my understanding that FTP-proxy works only on the interface IP, > not on virtual IPs. Is that correct? If so, that's horribly > limiting, especially on the WAN. Is there no way to configure it for > virtual IPs via a shell command or something? It's already in HEAD, though I haven't had the time to test it: http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/pics/FirewallNATPort% 20ForwardEdit1152049041307.png BR, PIT ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- copyleft(c) by | "How do you pronounce SunOS?" "Just like you Peter Allgeyer | _-_ hear it, with a big SOS" -- dedicated to | 0(o_o)0 Roland Kaltefleiter ---------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------------------------- --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
