Why not call them 1.0-SNAPSHOT-2006-09-03? At least they'll sort correctly in a listing. Or are we really talking about the 8th and 9th of march 2006?
It proves that pfSense is a global programme, when date representation issues arise :) -----Original Message----- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 5 September 2006 6:17 a.m. To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense snapshot 09-03-06 embedded On 9/4/06, Imre Ispánovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just upgraded RC2 today to the latest > pfSense-Mini-Embedded-Update-1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-03-06 > It shows on system overview page as > "1.0-SNAPSHOT-08-03-06 built on Thu Aug 10 19:38:26 UTC 2006" Did I > missed something, or is it just wrong title there and I may ignore it > safely? Otherwise firmware upgrade went smoothly on generic pc (Compaq > SFF P3/400Mhz/256MB/64MB CF card) Typo. For some reason I was a month back in time when I prepared these images. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
