So if I understand correctly you are porting pfsense to 6.2 instead
of back porting the driver? That looks like a fabulous solution and
quite a bit more sustainable for the future.
Thank you
Pierre
On 5-Sep-06, at 9:28 PM, Bill Marquette wrote:
I'm currently working on updating our patches against RELENG_6. That
branch should be locked shortly pending the tagging of RELENG_6_2 -
we'd like to be able to start building that branch shortly after
release (there are no plans to delay 1.0 release for this). It
shouldn't take me more than a day or two (work is eating up a lot of
my hacking time right now) to retool our build/patch system - at that
point I can send a test kernel your way.
--Bill
On 9/1/06, Pierre Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me know your conclusions and will talk.
Pierre
On 1-Sep-06, at 4:17 PM, Bill Marquette wrote:
If all it takes is $50 I would be happy to oblige the board did cost
me $500 and it is worthless without a driver.
Understood, they aren't cheap boards. To be clear, what I'm offering
is to provide a replacement kernel (that can be uploaded as a
firmware
image) for 1.0 and any major future RCs (such as RC3) that we release
for 1.0. At the point where we release an official version all
personal support for this kernel will be ceased. As I haven't looked
at the amount of work required to backport the imported driver I
can't
make a guarantee on it just yet, but I do happen to have a relatively
open evening tonight.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
