> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > On 9/26/06, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> On 9/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> > i know there has been a million threads about openvpn lately, so
>> >> its
>> >> >> time
>> >> >> > to throw mine into the mix too.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > i have 2 sites, with an ipsec tunnel between them.  site 1 is
>> >> >> > 192.168.125.0/26 and site 2 is 192.168.125.64/26.   both sites
>> are
>> >> >> just a
>> >> >> > simple single pfsense box (no carp or redundants or anything
>> fancy.
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > ipsec vpn works great, and any host at any site can connect to
>> any
>> >> >> other
>> >> >> > host.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > site 2 has the openvpn on it, and i can connect in fine with
>> >> windows
>> >> >> xp
>> >> >> > from the internet.  once connected, i can connect to any host at
>> >> site2
>> >> >> > with no problems.  my issue, is that i cannot traverse the ipsec
>> >> vpn
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> > hosts at site1.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > anyone have any ideas where i can begin to troubleshoot this
>> issue?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> are you pushing the additional ipsec routes to your openvpn
>> clients
>> >> >> via the pfsense custom options field?  (see the note in the wiki
>> docs
>> >> >> on how to do this)
>> >> >
>> >> > And is the OpenVPN range part of the IPSec tunnel?
>> >> >
>> >> > --Bill
>> >>
>> >> if i understand your question correctly, no sir, my openvpn range is
>> >> seperate.  192.168.125.128/26.
>> >>
>> >> thank you,
>> >> jonathan
>> >
>> > Then the IPSec definition doesn't match and the traffic won't be
>> > forwarded over the tunnel.
>> >
>> > --Bill
>>
>>
>> ah, i can see how that would be a problem.  where do i need to go in the
>> gui to ix this?
>>
>
> We don't have an obvious way to add another network to a tunnel.
> However, you can create another tunnel with the same endpoints and the
> new network in it.  It's a little duplication, but it does work.
>
> --Bill

thank you bill.  rather than creating a new vpn tunnel, i just changed the
vpn subnet to 192.168.125.112/28 (techically within the 192.168.125.64/26
footprint).  this has caused vpn clients to be able to traverse to my
192.168.125.0/26 site1 now.  my only inconvenience was that i had to move
my site2 dhcp scope a bit, which really isnt a big deal at all.

cheers,
jonathan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to