thanks. I will give it a shot >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/5/2007 4:29:10 PM >>> It is a snapshot. Which is the 1.0.X tree. Only bug fixes + minor improvements are commited to RELENG_1.
On 2/5/07, Bill Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is this version 1.01? > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/5/2007 4:18:48 PM >>> > Not really a beta as its quite tested, but the latest version (which > you should be using for snort, btw) is located here: > http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/iso/ > > Scott > > > On 2/5/07, Bill Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think I might start from scratch. Do you guys have any beta stuff > to > > test. I can run it on my new box? > > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/5/2007 4:13:30 PM >>> > > I have never seen that before. Maybe snort was already running so > it > > could not lock the file? > > > > On 2/5/07, Bill Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ok, I put a new box together with enough memory for snort (the BTX > > issue > > > which was stupid to ask, so sorry), and here is a sample of my > logs. > > I > > > am not sure what all of this means, but it doesn't look good. > > > > > > snort2c[864]: SIGTERM received - exiting > > > Feb 5 13:57:32 snort2c[864]: SIGTERM received - exiting > > > Feb 5 13:57:32 snort[851]: Daemon parent exiting > > > Feb 5 13:57:32 snort[851]: Daemon parent exiting > > > Feb 5 13:57:30 snort[851]: Child exited unexpectedly > > > Feb 5 13:57:30 snort[851]: Child exited unexpectedly > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[866]: FATAL ERROR: Failed to Lock PID File > > > "/var/run//snort_fxp0.pid" for PID "866" > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[866]: FATAL ERROR: Failed to Lock PID File > > > "/var/run//snort_fxp0.pid" for PID "866" > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[866]: PID path stat checked out ok, PID path > > set > > > to /var/run/ > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[866]: PID path stat checked out ok, PID path > > set > > > to /var/run/ > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[866]: Var 'fxp0_ADDRESS' redefined > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[866]: Var 'fxp0_ADDRESS' redefined > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Initializing daemon mode > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Initializing daemon mode > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: , value = 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: , value = 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Var 'fxp0_ADDRESS' defined, value len = > > 25 > > > chars > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Var 'fxp0_ADDRESS' defined, value len = > > 25 > > > chars > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key 'ms_sql_seen_dns' > > is > > > checked but not ever set. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key 'ms_sql_seen_dns' > > is > > > checked but not ever set. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key > 'fkwp_conn_suc_cts' > > is > > > set but not ever checked. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key > 'fkwp_conn_suc_cts' > > is > > > set but not ever checked. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key > > > 'backdoor.charon.download.log.1' is checked but not ever set. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key > > > 'backdoor.charon.download.log.1' is checked but not ever set. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key > > > 'optixlite_fai_conn_cts' is set but not ever checked. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key > > > 'optixlite_fai_conn_cts' is set but not ever checked. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key > > 'dce.bind.netware_cs' > > > is checked but not ever set. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key > > 'dce.bind.netware_cs' > > > is checked but not ever set. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key 'odf.file' is set > > but > > > not ever checked. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key 'odf.file' is set > > but > > > not ever checked. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key > 'dce.bind.veritas' > > is > > > set but not ever checked. > > > Feb 5 13:57:29 snort[851]: Warning: flowbits key > 'dce.bind.veritas' > > is > > > set but not ever checked. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/5/2007 11:23 AM >>> > > > On 2/5/07, Bill Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > is 512 enough? or should I move to a system that has 1 gig? > > > > > > I would follow what the release caveats page states. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
