-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Okay, lets see:


> Otherwise, you have, potentially:
> Misconfigured browsers

Tried different workstations as well with different browsers and
different Operation systems :-).

> Misconfigured networking / firewall on user hosts

We have tried different maschines ..

> Possibly misconifgured ACLs in switching medium?

The switch is just a simple Dell and unmanaged.

I will try to telnet and to get the index page. Tomorrow i can send the
extracted TCP Dump to one of these websites.

Thanks for for the follow up.

Richard

Tim Allender schrieb:
> When you open the telnet connections, try talking to the server and see
> what responses you get back.
> Here's the syntax: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616.html
> 
> For example
> # telnet snort.org 80
> Trying 199.107.65.177...
> Connected to snort.org.
> GET / HTTP/1.1
> 
> You should get the html output for the root directory of the snort.org
> webserver.
> If your telnet client gets that HTML, your web browser ~should~ be able
> to get that HTML also.
> And, if it does, wallah! It works.
> Otherwise, you have, potentially:
> Misconfigured browsers
> Misconfigured networking / firewall on user hosts
> Possibly misconifgured ACLs in switching medium?
> 
> Could be a number of things,
> but if you're running a pfsense default configuration, considering
> everything we've verified, the problem is not your:
> Internet Connection
> Networking
> DNS
> Firewall
> 
> Richard wrote:
>> Thanks for the follow up.
>>
>> Lets see:
>>
>>   
>>> # telnet snort.org 80
>>> # telnet download.freenet.de 80
>>>     
>>
>> telnet from workstation (ubuntu)
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet download.freenet.de 80
>> Trying 194.97.4.66...
>> Connected to download.freenet.de.
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet snort.org 80
>> Trying 199.107.65.177...
>> Connected to snort.org.
>>
>> Okay, here is where the wired part starts ;-).
>> I still can provide a tcpdump if you like.
>> Still any idear ?
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>> You should be able to open those connections.
>>>
>>> If not, check your filter logs, they should indicate where the problem
>>> is.
>>>
>>> ~Tim
>>>
>>> Richard wrote: 
>>>     
>>>> Hi Tim,
>>>>
>>>> thanks very much for taking the time to answer. You are absolutly right
>>>> but I already did all steps you have mention.
>>>>
>>>> But let me check these examples:
>>>> download.freenet.de
>>>> snort.org
>>>>
>>>> All examples are in network.txt attached in this mail. (ping/traceroute)
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you can have a deeper look into a tcpdump? Interessting: if you
>>>> have a look at the tcp stream you will see that the first part of the
>>>> website is transfered and than it suddenly stops. 
>>>> The firewall is corrently at factory defaults (just changed security
>>>> settings)
>>>>
>>>> Again, thanks for your help!
>>>>
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>> Am Mittwoch, den 14.02.2007, 10:14 -0500 schrieb Tim Allender:
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>>> Excuse me if this seems pedantic.
>>>>>
>>>>> You say, although you have network connection to the majority of the 
>>>>> Internet, you cannot make connections to specific locations, for 
>>>>> example, sf.net
>>>>> Initially, I would doubt that this is a hardware / driver / PPoE 
>>>>> problem, as you've verified operability.
>>>>> You've given a lot of details, but haven't explicitly stated the obvious 
>>>>> level 1 support checks.
>>>>>
>>>>>  From a shell on the pfsense box, given sf.net (66.35.250.203), verify 
>>>>> IP is / is not working:
>>>>> # ping 66.35.250.203
>>>>> Then check the route
>>>>> # traceroute 66.35.250.203
>>>>>
>>>>> If these check out, the network is fine. Escalate to DNS verification, 
>>>>> else check routes / firewall rules at route break point.
>>>>> DNS: Same test, only this time using sf.net
>>>>> If these check out, DNS is fine. Escalate to protocol verification, else 
>>>>> fix DNS issue.
>>>>> Protocols: You may be unwittingly filtering out certain protocols which 
>>>>> make it appear to LAN users that "30% of the internet" is unreachable, 
>>>>> when in fact it's possible that 30% of the application protocol traffic 
>>>>> isn't passing normally.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pull up the filter logs and see what's going on.
>>>>> If you need to, take a dump (on both interfaces) and analyze further.
>>>>>
>>>>> ~Tim
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>>>> Hello Team / Supporters,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i have a very wired problem with pfsense.
>>>>>> Please take some time to read the complete mail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Infrastructure
>>>>>> ========
>>>>>> 4Mbit ADSL Connection / ADSL Modem / no other Internet Infrastructure
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Problem description:
>>>>>> ===========
>>>>>> 30% of the Internet seams to be not available. Part of this 30% are for
>>>>>> example  snort.org / download.freenet.de / sf.net. Users who are trying
>>>>>> to access one of these sites must have to wait endless. No connection
>>>>>> seams to be possible. So far so good:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Troubleshooting:
>>>>>> ===========
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Software
>>>>>>  ==
>>>>>> Restarting DSL-Modem / Firewall / DNS Server - no effect
>>>>>> Reseting the Firewall to default value - no effect
>>>>>> Changing Firewall rule's / Nat - no effect
>>>>>> Changing MTU size in shell/web 1492 / 1456 / 1400 / 1500 - no effect
>>>>>> With or without DNS/DNS Forward - no effect
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hardware
>>>>>>  == 
>>>>>> Reinstalling the Firewall - no effect
>>>>>> -Switching to our old Firewall (Watchguard) - *everything working fine*
>>>>>> Trying different NIC - no effect
>>>>>> Installing pfsense on a completly different hardware - no effect
>>>>>> Trying pfsense dev build - no effect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *no effect means that the websites mention above are available, other
>>>>>> parts of the internet are working.
>>>>>> ================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As i mention before, with our old Watchguard, everything is working fine
>>>>>> using PPoE Connections. I'm absoluty out of ideas. I'm actually
>>>>>> expecting no answers to that email ;-), but the hope dies at last.
>>>>>> PFsense is exactly what i'm looking for, i'm really said that we can't
>>>>>> use at the moment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you might want to help, please let me know. A tcpdump can be
>>>>>> provided.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks very much for taking the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>           
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> # ping download.freenet.de
>>>>> PING download.freenet.de (194.97.4.66): 56 data bytes
>>>>> 64 bytes from 194.97.4.66: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=90.252 ms
>>>>> 64 bytes from 194.97.4.66: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=89.904 ms
>>>>>
>>>>> # ping snort.org
>>>>> PING snort.org (199.107.65.177): 56 data bytes
>>>>> --- snort.org ping statistics ---
>>>>> 8 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
>>>>> (maybe icmp blocked)
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's continue with traceroute download.freenet.de
>>>>>
>>>>> # traceroute download.freenet.de
>>>>> traceroute to download.freenet.de (194.97.4.66), 64 hops max, 40 byte 
>>>>> packets
>>>>>  1  kiel3.bb.addix.net (212.51.31.92)  76.238 ms  76.406 ms  76.076 ms
>>>>>  2  fe201-kiel1.bb.addix.net (212.51.31.124)  76.611 ms  76.863 ms  
>>>>> 75.725 ms
>>>>>  3  ADDIX.HAM-4-atm131-732.de.lambdanet.net (217.71.107.237)  79.277 ms  
>>>>> 78.707 ms  78.566 ms
>>>>>  4  DUS-2-pos300.de.lambdanet.net (217.71.96.13)  87.431 ms  87.329 ms  
>>>>> 133.045 ms
>>>>>  5  DUS-1-pos010.de.lambdanet.net (217.71.96.89)  87.425 ms  87.299 ms  
>>>>> 88.904 ms
>>>>>  6  DUS-5-pos300.de.lambdanet.net (217.71.96.54)  91.400 ms  89.358 ms  
>>>>> 88.861 ms
>>>>>  7  G2-0-802.dus1-g.mcbone.net (217.71.108.150)  88.695 ms  89.167 ms  
>>>>> 88.664 ms
>>>>>  8  Vlan55.dus2-x0.mcbone.net (62.104.198.10)  87.422 ms  88.845 ms  
>>>>> 100.951 ms
>>>>>  9  * * *
>>>>> 10  * * *
>>>>> 11  * * *
>>>>> 12  * * *
>>>>> 13  * * *
>>>>> 14  * * *
>>>>> 15  * * *
>>>>> 16  * * *
>>>>> 17  * * *
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> # traceroute snort.org
>>>>> traceroute to snort.org (199.107.65.177), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
>>>>>  1  kiel3.bb.addix.net (212.51.31.92)  76.202 ms  77.661 ms  75.852 ms
>>>>>  2  fe201-kiel1.bb.addix.net (212.51.31.124)  76.869 ms  76.014 ms  
>>>>> 75.817 ms
>>>>>  3  ADDIX.HAM-4-atm131-732.de.lambdanet.net (217.71.107.237)  79.569 ms  
>>>>> 79.238 ms  79.271 ms
>>>>>  4  hbg-b2-geth1-2-0-12.telia.net (213.248.76.129)  79.808 ms  79.187 ms  
>>>>> 78.827 ms
>>>>>  5  hbg-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.251.77)  79.098 ms  79.213 ms  79.402 ms
>>>>>  6  ldn-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.249.10)  92.211 ms
>>>>>     adm-bb1-pos7-0-0.telia.net (213.248.65.153)  107.832 ms
>>>>>     ldn-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.249.10)  93.449 ms
>>>>>  7  ldn-bb1-pos7-0-0.telia.net (213.248.65.149)  93.045 ms
>>>>>     nyk-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.65.98)  159.567 ms  160.239 ms
>>>>>  8  ash-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.83.22)  198.568 ms
>>>>>     ash-bb1-pos6-0-0-0.telia.net (213.248.80.69)  239.648 ms
>>>>>     ash-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.83.22)  197.190 ms
>>>>>  9  ash-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.83.22)  200.437 ms
>>>>>     192.205.33.1 (192.205.33.1)  177.013 ms *
>>>>> 10  tbr1034001.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.80.98)  179.165 ms  178.522 ms  
>>>>> 178.878 ms
>>>>> 11  tbr1034001.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.80.98)  181.246 ms
>>>>>     12.123.8.17 (12.123.8.17)  175.567 ms  178.498 ms
>>>>> 12  12.123.8.17 (12.123.8.17)  179.845 ms
>>>>>     12.122.255.2 (12.122.255.2)  176.452 ms  177.499 ms
>>>>> 13  63.240.197.134 (63.240.197.134)  177.353 ms  178.085 ms  177.350 ms
>>>>> 14  63.240.198.67 (63.240.198.67)  177.605 ms
>>>>>     63.240.197.134 (63.240.197.134)  179.209 ms
>>>>>     63.240.198.67 (63.240.198.67)  176.753 ms
>>>>> 15  * 63.240.198.67 (63.240.198.67)  179.625 ms *
>>>>> 16  * * *
>>>>> 17  * * *
>>>>> 18  * * *
>>>>> 19  * * *
>>>>> 20  * * *
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>         
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>   
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF02n/9tK6oi5gM2IRAofIAKCGj8bVo0XJzlQoTtF5RQYXM7R/KACfWIBC
qBw+iA7sPvzZGzdT7HEvaCg=
=P8f9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to