Paul Mansfield wrote: > VPN server v.v.v.v has a server, with a pool of IPs set to > 10.10.10.40/29, using X509 certificates to authenticate - clients are > my-vpn-client1 and my-vpn-client2 ... > Sep 13 22:23:14 localhost openvpn[55031]: my-vpn-client2/n.n.n.n:9680 > MULTI: no free --ifconfig-pool addresses are available ... > I am wondering whether it's my choice of /29 for the server pool? I have > a large number of openvpn listeners, all on their own port and all > subnetted off the 10.10.10.0/24, one server for each small group of > users, so that I can tightly lock down their network access.
I have created a new vpn entry, this time using 172.16.x.x/24 as the pool and preliminary results *seem* to indicate that this works, I will confirm this when I've done more extensive testing. Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
