It was always my understanding that pfsense stability came before
features. I don't mind that, because i would rather have a product that
works 100% of the time, without the features i want. Rather then a
product that works 50% of the time, with all the features I want.
Adam
Tim A. wrote:
I don't get it. Sure there's a lot of features people want to add. And
the answer is typically, "2.0".
But what is the major platform difference for this major revision?
I just built HEAD (2.0 on 7_2) and... umm... I like 1.2.3, at least it
works.
This is so broken and as far as I can tell, most of its the same anyway.
Why not just add new features / fix things on whats already working so
well?
I'm trying RELENG_2_0 now, maybe that'll be more encouraging.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4219 (20090705) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
