This is what I get on the 1.2.3 side: racoon: *[Unknown Gateway/Dynamic]*: ERROR: no policy found: 192.168.20.0/24[0] 192.168.4.0/24[0] proto=any dir=in
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Paul Peziol <joyride...@gmail.com> wrote: > How would I set that up.Do I need 2 separate tunnels created or can I use 1 > tunnel to route both networks. I tried to setup both subnets in the 2.0 > version to connect to the 1.2.3 (that has 2 subnets) and it would error > out. > > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Abdulrehman <arvagabo...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Yes you can...Inface I have 3 different subnets on IPsec. >> >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Paul Peziol <joyride...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> I have come across where pfsense 2.0 can support multiple networks over >>> ipsec. Can I create a tunnel between pfsense 1.2.3rc1 and 2.0beta2. >>> I have a 192.168.20.0/24 network behind the 2.0 pfsense (Site A) and >>> behind the 1.2.3 I have 192.168.2.0/24 and 192.168.4.0/24 (Site B). Is >>> it possible create a tunnel between site A and site B where Site A can >>> access both networks on SiteB. I created the 2nd Phase2 policy in SiteA but >>> that never seems to come up. While the 192.168.2.0 networks connects. >>> >>> Considering SiteB is a production environment I hesitate to upgrade to a >>> beta version right now. Site A is not as critical as its a home office >>> Thank you >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Regards >> Abdulrehman >> > >
