The "stable" one would not let me add a backend, it kept telling me that "weight" was mandatory even tho I was entering a number for it. The other one seems fine.
Thanks, Josh. > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 06 August 2010 06:42 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] haproxy > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Hiren Joshi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm running a master/slave setup of 1.2.3 and about to > install haproxy, > > I have 2 options under packages: > > BETA-0.29 > > and > > BETA-0.30 > > > > My question, why is the newer one marked as "stable"? > > > > As we were doing some work on the package for a customer, we created > yet another version for a reason that escapes me at the moment. Either > of the non -dev ones should be fine. We need to get that back down to > two (at most, not sure -dev is needed anymore either), I'm checking on > which of those should still be around. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
