On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Dimitri Rodis
<dimit...@integritasystems.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Dimitri Rodis 
> <dimit...@integritasystems.com> wrote:
>> pfSense 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Wed Jan 19 12:45:14 EST 2011
>>
>>
>>
>> When I try to use an alias in the Internal IP field (suppose the alias
>> was
>> XXXX) I receive the following error upon saving (or trying to save):
>>
>>
>>
>> The following input errors were detected:
>>
>>                 XXXX is not a valid internal IP address
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I know in <2.0 you could not use aliases in the 1:1 fields, but in
>> this version the boxes are RED, implying that aliases are allowed. I
>> don't know if this is a bug or just a mistake (in formatting the
>> fields RED) but in any event it looks like something needs to be fixed
>> or changed. I did not try using an Alias in the External Subnet IP field, 
>> although it is RED also.
>>
>>
>>That's correct, the fields shouldn't be red though, I just fixed that.
>>Aliases aren't supported in binat in pf.
>
> Even if binat doesn't support them, they could theoretically be "resolved" 
> via code prior to updating the rules....in 2.1 :)
>
You can put a feature request on redmine.pfsense.org so it does not
get forgotten.



-- 
Ermal

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org

Reply via email to