Compliance= we us a third party service to capture all instant messages and it works by assigning a proxy.
Leon Goldstein Principal [cid:[email protected]] New York Office One Penn Plaza 36th Floor New York, NY 10119 NY: 212.457.5000 Operations Center 9 North Main Street Suite 3 Marlboro, NJ 07746 NJ: 732.972.3396 Customer Service 866.586.TECH (8324) [email protected]<x-msg://62/[email protected]> http://www.innervisionit.com<http://www.innervisionit.com/> On Nov 28, 2012, at 2:15 PM, David Woolley <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Leon Goldstein wrote: We are adding compliance of IM for our clients and our compliance company is stating that pidgin does not work well with proxy servers. I didn't understand "compliance" on the first reading. The question was compliance with what? I presume you mean some financial trading rules that require all communications to be logged, and not the payment card industry rules that require some things should never be logged! I wonder if the issue with Pidgin is that, being a multi-protocol client, some of the protocols won't be known to the man in the middle software, and the security architecture of some of them may be badly compromised even though the user is aware of the man in the middle, e.g. login credentials may be compromised. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
<<inline: image001.gif>>
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list Want to unsubscribe? Use this link: http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
