On Nov 20, 2007 12:54 AM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandru Popescu ☀ wrote: > > > I don't think it is a complex issue to fix it. However, I am missing > > the details on what source code I should work. And also what would be > > the process (as you already know the old one wasn't the perfect one :) > > ). > > I think it makes the most sense for you to be able to check-in to Surefire > trunk. I think Brett said he was working on getting check-in rights for > you, but getting check-in rights can take some time. (Not exactly certain > what to do in the meantime...?) > > In my opinion, at this point, I don't think it's really clear to me what > bugs need to be fixed, except that Surefire itself needs more tests. I'm > working on doing that with an eye towards assessing the quality of > Surefire and getting to the point where we could decide what needs work. > (See other remarks in the surefire-dev archives for more details on that.) >
Dan having tests will help a lot. I am NOT a maven user and for me it will be extremely hard to guarantee that everything works, so your help will be really appreciated. I am gonna compare again the trunk with my last version and see if any of my old changes got in. If not then I will have to wait for more news from Brett. In case my previous changes have been incorporated in the trunk, then I guess I will be able to work on it in the next couple of days. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. > -Dan
