On 11/27/2010 12:00 AM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:28:27PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> 
>> let's hope we can surf the wake and profit from the general interest in
>> with-height sound reproduction and get some people to ask the right
>> questions.
> 
> First question: how does it compare to 3h1v ?

like apples to oranges.

the way they mix, there are almost no phasing artifacts. but
localisation breaks up to the sides and rear, as expected. it sounds
basically as if you would stick four more speakers on top of 5.1 (oh
wait, you mean that's what they did???).

they claim "no sweet spot", and there has been loads of other marketing
drivel. there is really nothing special to it, just more discrete
speakers. the interesting thing is they seem to have a codec that will
hide the upper signals within a valid pcm stream for the usual 5.1,
which might be quite elegant in terms of distribution and compatibility.
but their claims are an insult to their customers' intelligence...

i've heard brief excerpts that were done with a "native" microphone
array - follows the usual "logic" of sticking  cardioids where speakers
are, pointing to the outside. looked quite ridiculous, as each mic was
in a rycote with fur cover - something you stick on a crane, not give a
boom operator. it was nice enough for ambient sound, but totally
unconvincing in terms of non-frontal localisation.

there was no talk of complete panning functions, and it looks like
that's not what they do. it seems to be the old acousmatic way - make
stereo pairs and work with those, separately.


-- 
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487

Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio), Elektrofachkraft
Audio and event engineer - Ambisonic surround recordings

http://stackingdwarves.net

_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to