I totally agree, any mention of MP3/WMA or any of the very lossy formats in the same breath as surround cannot be taken seriously.
Flac has done a sterling job, most people use it, and so far I've no complaints......... (oh, now what have I started.... LOL) Richard I dont know why FLAC and MP3 are mentioned in the same sentence. While FLAC is reckoned to be non-lossy (and certainly seems to be so), MP3 is definitely lossy and I would personally not expect a sursound file in that format to be worth listening to seriously. Just my two penn'oth... David _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2101/4637 - Release Date: 11/24/11 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20111125/b2c4c55e/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
