... so I tested loading these 48kHz filters but I get a "Invalid header" error in Max/MSP when trying the HRTF files. The coll files work fine. Is there any mayor difference between the two that I might be missing? I used a hex editor to inspect the header and compared it with a 44.1 file and found that indeed there is different info there. Are these for a recent version of Spat? Mine is from 2010.
Hector On 2012-01-13, at 12:50 PM, Hector Centeno wrote: > Thank you Thibaut, I've been looking for these for long time! I couldn't find > them easily in the IRCAM website. > > Cheers, > > Hector > > On 2012-01-13, at 7:47 AM, Thibaut Carpentier wrote: > >> >> >> Le 13 janv. 2012 à 00:52, Hector Centeno a écrit : >>> >>> I guess I could use a different HRTF measurement to avoid the front/back >>> reversal. IRCAM's Spat comes with other impulse SDIF files that are 44.1kHz >>> only so I wonder if anyone knows how to resample them to 48kHz, which is >>> what I use. >>> >> >> 48kHz filters for Spat : >> http://echanges.ircam.fr/filez/download.php?ad=239605ZfpX >> >> I do interpolate separately the excess phase part and the magnitude >> spectrum, rather than resampling the HRIR. >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120113/6ec6fbd6/attachment.html> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sursound mailing list >> Sursound@music.vt.edu >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
