But lots of people already have five channel systems.
What they do not have is a Trifield processor built in
to their "receivers" to make stereo into three channel.
They have other schemes to do this, but not Trifield.
This seems to be an oversight--unless people do not
feel that Trifield is really better?
Robert
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Richard Dobson wrote:
On 02/04/2012 17:21, Robert Greene wrote:
..
It is really not too late at least for Trifield. If it is really
better
how will people know? It is only a minority who bother to go to demos and
shows.
, people would respond. (Actually at a Meridian demo I heard,
I thought it sounded worse than stereo. For one thing,
the speakers were not far enough apart so that it sounded too mono--this
sort of thing does not help the cause).
Well, hmm, three speakers cost approximately 50% more than the price of two.
Plus whatever extra special kit is needed. You ~might~ manage to sell the
idea if you can establish beyond doubt that the improvement is at least that
much. It is very easy to persuade people that two speakers really are more
than 100% better than one. Unless the added speaker produces a commensurate
hike in quality over the two (and domestic hifi dealers are happy to stock
and sell 3.0 speaker sets), I suspect the take-up will (continue to be) low.
This is a niche market inside a niche market.
Richard Dobson
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
