On 22 February 2013 02:25, Eric Carmichel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Within the context of room reflections, music listening,
> home theatre, and the like, I’m fully aware that frequencies below 80 Hz
>  are near impossible to localize. Add to the overall auditory scene the
> constituent frequencies that provide unambiguous sound-source
> information, the need for a surround of subs really goes out the window.

My personal experience has been that whilst it may be difficult to
locate low frequencies on their own (though nowhere near as difficult
as some manufacturers have suggested), it is relatively easy to spot
when they are wrongly located if they are component part of a wider
band sound source in a coherent sound field. I first became convinced
of this when I heard the with-height rig at AMS when they owned
Calrec/Soundfield which had the subs all in one place outside, rather
than in,  the main rig. No matter what they played, it was always
obvious that the low bass was separate and "over there" rather than
part of the main sound field. (well, ok, the tape playing actually had
to have some bass, but...)

Dave

-- 
As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from the University, so this
disclaimer is redundant....


These are my own views and may or may not be shared by my employer

Dave Malham
Ex-Music Research Centre
Department of Music
The University of York
Heslington
York YO10 5DD
UK

'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to