On Tuesday, December 17, 2013, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:53:23AM +1100, Alexis Shaw wrote:
>
> > > 1. That's giant overkill, completely useless. Whatever you need
> > >    as filtering in a decoder can be done easily with much shorter
> > >    impulse response. Or even with some simple IIR filters.
> >
> > It is overkill for anything except room correction where you often need
> 1/2
> > second of filtering
> > At 386khz that leads to a 128k fir filter
>
> * 386 kHz ?? Even 192 is completely useless.
>
> * Half a second of room correction would be useful only at very low
>   frequencies (unless you want to correct your bathroom). And if and
>   when it is necesssary, that part of the frequency range can be
>   processed at a much lower sample rate and require only a short filter.
>
> * And then, room correction would be done on the speaker signals,
>   not on the complete matrix. The latter *is* possible of course,
>   and would be ideal, *iff* you can derive the filters. Which would
>   require measuring the room response in higher order Ambisonic format,
>   not on option unless you have a EigenMike, and even then dubious.
>
> My other project is making an eigenmike type microphone using 1000 mems
microphones
I am intending to do that....

>
> > > 2. The method you propose (DFT, matrix, IDFT) is wrong, you'd need
> > >    linear convolution which is not the same thing.
> > >
> > > No you are wrong here, convolusion in. The time domain is equivelent to
> > multiplication in the
> > Fourier domain. That is simple sampling theory. Look up the overlap and
> add
> > method of fir filter implementation
>
> You don't have to tell me that (as the author of zita-convolver).
> But DFT, multiply, IDFT without overlap (which is what the OP
> described) won't do it.


Btw I am the op.

>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
> A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
> It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
> and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu <javascript:;>
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131217/b800bf3d/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to