--Richard

> On 12 Mar 2014, at 14:11, umashankar manthravadi <umasha...@hotmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> dear richard
> 
> we are almost there. The mechanics was easy, but figuring out a reliable 
> calibration system proved quite tough. We now have a system where we take 40 
> measurements on a hemisphere using angelo's log sine sweep. the inverse sine 
> is corrected once every session with a calibration microphone. We now have it 
> down pat.
> 
> The next stage was taking these 40 x 4 irs and producing a small 4 x 4 matrix 
> of filters to use with brahmavolver. Angelo again provided the Matlab scripts 
> he uses and Marc Lavallée has converted these to Octave and has sent me a 
> virtual OS(also called Brahma, but it is a pared down Debian). We create a 
> new microphone folder, copy all the ir files (five x four channels) and the 
> program (also called Brahma) cuts the eight irs in each file to 256 samples, 
> and then does all the math needed to generate the output 4 channel file - 
> about 33 k in size.
> 
> I have not listened with filters for the prototype Brahma with which I have 
> done some recordings as it was only measured today. but using FilterMatrix 
> derived for other microphones seems to work quite well. I had dismantled my 
> ambisonics rig and have not set it up yet, but I use VVMic to test rotation 
> and zoom etc. the most amazing effect I have heard is to zoom out and the 
> sound almost disappears, and then rotate 180 degrees for closeup sound? The 
> image does not collapse at all, and in one recording I can rotate and tilt 
> the mic to centre on an airconditioning duct.
> 
> Yes the Zoom H2 is a very good device and when it came out there was no other 
> low cost four channel recorder. H2N is a higher quality device except for the 
> annoying habit of treating the two channels at the rear as ms, converting to 
> xy and then calling the file MS. You must have seen the photos of the brahma 
> tetrahedron mounted in the h2n. Ten of them have been measured and 6 are 
> calibrated with their own FilterMatrix files.
> 
> But today, finally, I got to hear the standalone Brahma microphone with its 
> Phantom power adaptor. Connected with shielded cat 6 cable and a five-pin 
> adaptor to the zoom, it is dramatically better than the Brahma connected 
> directly to Zoom H2N. I have a nice little circuit that has enormous gain 
> (almost line level), very little noise and sweet sound!
> 
> I wish there was a place to upload samples. I do not have rights to put out 
> entire recordings, but small five minute samples would be nice. I have 
> classical Hindustani music played on the saxophone, and a sarod and table 
> recording.
> 
> We have orders for nearly 50 all told (from the kickstarter). After that, I 
> would like to send a few out (one to each continent) for people to try out 
> and pass it on, sort of. My aim is not selling more, but get people to listen 
> and tell me what they think.
> 
> (this mail has gotten so long I think I should post it to the group as well.
> 
> umashankar
> 
> From: rich...@blueripplesound.com
> To: umasha...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Zoom H2 / Brahma
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:42:37 +0000
> 
> Hi there! I was contacted last week by someone wondering about using the H2 
> unmodified for WXY ambisonic recording and I ran through the maths that Paul 
> Hodges put at http://ambisonic.info/zoomh2.html - it looks right to me! I ran 
> a quick experiment with my brother’s H2 and it seemed basically fine. I’ve 
> emailed him to find out a bit more about whatever problems he was having. 
> Anyway, I’m rather impressed with the H2 – I clearly hadn’t looked at it 
> carefully enough and I can certainly see why what you’re doing around the 
> Brahma mike makes good sense! I’d love to hear how this is getting on, and if 
> we can help. Are the capsules behaving themselves in context (e.g. not 
> collapsing too badly to mono)?  Many thanks! Best wishes, --Richard           
>               
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20140312/bd177975/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to