> Hi,
>
> Thanks everybody for your well-considered comments.
> The reason for going for a 2-channel format is compatibility with
> distribution media formats (CD) - and I suppose it will mostly be listened
> to without a decoder.
> The possibility of recovering (2D) B-Format can be very useful, I think
> (although apparently not 100% possible).
>

My (perhaps idealistic) point, was that if you create as B-format ... then
you can export as UHJ, as Blumlein stereo, as ..., ..., ... (and you have
B-format in archive, _if_ you ever get the chanve to listen to / play
that).

But I accept that may be more than you want to do ...

Michael


> Cheers,
> Marlon
>
> On Mar 15, 2014, at 12:00 , sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote:
>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:08:22 -0000 (GMT)
>> From: "Michael Chapman" <s...@mchapman.com>
>> To: "Surround Sound discussion group" <sursound@music.vt.edu>
>> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Question about UHJ
>> Message-ID: <54597.109.213.106.225.1394813302.m...@i-a-a.ch>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
>>
>>> There is another point - you can recover the B-Format horizontal
>>> information from UHj - so, notionally, using Bruce Wiggins' irregular
>>> decoding, you could display it on 5.1
>>>
>>
>> Why not make a three/four track ambisonic (B-format) master and make
>> derivatives (such as UHJ) from that ?
>>
>> Marie-Antoinette ... ur no, sorry, Michael
>>
>>> Dr. Peter Lennox
>>>
>>> School of Technology,
>>> Faculty of Arts, Design and Technology
>>> University of Derby, UK
>>> e: p.len...@derby.ac.uk
>>> t: 01332 593155
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>

_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to