#641 & #650 refer to posts on the Gearslutz page https://www.gearslutz.com/board/remote-possibilities-acoustic-music-loca tion-recording/547304-soundfield-mic-stereo-application-22.html
#641 describes his initial mods to the stick .. very similar (??!) to Ken's Mk5 #650 describes putting the FETs on the capsule backplate. This gives probably the most improvement. When I emerged from the bush, I toyed with the idea of offering a similar souping up service for Soundfields. But the risk of damage in transit due to the flimsy tetrahedron is very high and I have no access to matched capsule sets. I strengthened the tetrahedron while I was at Calrec ... but not enough :( ---------- From: Dave Malham[SMTP:dave.mal...@york.ac.uk] Sent: Mon, 19 October 2015 17:48 To: rica...@justnet.com.au; Surround Sound discussion group Subject: Re: [Sursound] Modified SoundField Mk IV What's the difference between #641 and #650?? Dave On 19 October 2015 at 06:38, Richard Lee <rica...@justnet.com.au> wrote: > > Interesting: https://www.gearslutz.com/board/11410162-post650.html > > I endorse Rudy's mods described in #641 and #650 > > Ken Farrar did something similar to his #641 mods in the Mk5 > > ... but I think his post should be titled "Where Beach Bums & Angels fear > to Tread" :) _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
