Or Botton wrote:
> Personally, I believe that the entire idea is to find away to clug
> the CPU with more work, so you'll have to buy a better, faster
> computer later. I know it sounds like Wintel bashing, but I cant
> find any logic in selling low-cost 500MHz which will run at the
> same speed (and most probebly the same cost) of a real 350MHz computer.
Currently it's probably cheaper to buy a real 350 MB & processor then
500 MHz ones.
--
Casper Gielen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.wxs.nl/~vcmeaned
--
What's so civil about war anyway?
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
