On 1999-06-01 Boanne said: >But I have a question. At PC Lube & Tune >(http://pclt.cis.yale.edu/pclt/default.htm) the author says: >With Windows3.x Windows was running under DOS - with Windows9x >DOS is running under Windows. What exactly does this mean, do >you know? Hehehe... it means the guy at PC Lube & Tune doesn't know what he's talking about. :) W95 runs on DOS. Definitely. W98 I'm not sure about. Mike To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
- [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Conventional Memory) Boanne Lorraine
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Conventional M... Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Conventional M... Boanne Lorraine
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Convention... Casper Gielen
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Convention... Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Conven... Wayne Pineault
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Conventional M... Mike Millen
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Convention... Ben A L Jemmett
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones, and food for thought.. Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Conventional M... Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Conventional M... Boanne Lorraine
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Conventional M... Pete
- Re: [SURVPC] Unix Clones (Was: Virtual Convention... Ben A L Jemmett