"Richard N. Hinton" wrote:
> 
> Dear SuSE enthusiast,
> 
>        A bunch of friends of mine are arguing about cost and security
> issues of various OS's
> related to Unix, i.e. BSDi, FreeBSD, RedHat Linux,  etc. They seem to be
> unaware of SuSE.
> Anyway, is there information about the reltive security holes in these
> OS's, including
> SUSE (which I use). From time to time I hear about RedHat finding and
> sealing various
> security holes.  Cost is realted to fixing the damages that an unwanted
> visitor, visited
> upon a working system....

Richard, truly, Linux is Linux.  The ONLY difference is the "goodies"
shipped with each distribution, including an installation utility. 
The "down side" of Linux is it's open source code, allowing those
social misfits to break into a Linux system, however, one of the BEST
things about Linux, is the open source, because fixes are VERY
quick!!  NT, for example, has more holes than Swiss cheese, but there
are very few beyond MickySoft who know what they are!!!  Linux STILL
is the MOST secure AND stable OS available...period, bar none!!

Fred

-- 
"Slicker 'n Willie Lube".......and that's doin some!

-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html

Reply via email to