Kim C. Callis wrote:
>
> ||
> || Just curious why you put your stuff in /boot. Is this "standard" for
> || 2.2.*, personal prefference or adapted from redhat?
>
> Ok, I admit it! I stole the idea to place my stuff in /boot from RedHat...
> I am slightly anal about the / directry being clean of everything except
> directories. Hence, I jumped on RedHat's layout of keeping kernel et. al.
> in /boot.
>
Today, i thought of doing the same. I am experimenting with my not yet
working zip drive (see my other thread) and all these "just in case"
saved kernels and map files spoil my root dir. /boot seems to be a good
carpet to brush this stuff under. :)
Juergen
--
========================================== __ _
Juergen Braukmann mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| -o)/ / (_)__ __ ____ __
Tel: 0201-743648 dk4jb@db0qs.#nrw.deu.eu| /\\ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /
==========================================_\_v __/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
