zentara wrote:
> OS2 was better than NT, as far as operation goes. It's only
> drawback was that it was a single user system, and did not
Zentara,
Did you see that story on CNN about NT 2000 having 25 million NEW lines
of code (80% of the entire source) and that MOST of the existing apps
will have to be ***rewritten*** to run on it?
Amazing. M$ and it's monopolistic co-conspiritors think that people
will sit still while they are forced shell out big bucks to replace WinX
with NT 2XXX and more big bucks to replace existing apps with identical
ones that run under NT 2XXX. I don't think so.
If people thought 1998 was the year Linux got noticed, wait till 1999 is
over and we look back and the MASSIVE ground swell of change that
occured.
Shift happens!
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
