Jim,

I tried mucking around with Linux FDISK today.  What I did as tests
follow:

First, I booted off CD #5 (the Live Filesystem CD) and ran fdisk from
/sbin.  I deleted all the partitions on the 4Gb hard disk in the PC (it
is the only drive, and is 4097Mb in size).  Then, I created a single,
primary drive 4050Mb in size, and set it's type to Win95 FAT16 (LBA) -
partition type e in fdisk.  I wrote the partition table and booted the
NT Server 4 CDROM.  Installation proceeded perfectly, and I stopped the
installation after it had successfully formatted as FAT (using 64Kb
clusters) the partition I had created in Linux.  The NT Setup program
saw the partition fine, and claimed it was "Unformatted  or damaged".

Next, I booted the Live Filesystem CD as before and ran fdisk.  This
time I deleted all the partitions and created a primary 2000Mb Win95 FAT
16 (LBA) partition (/dev/hda1) and another primary Win95 FAT16 (LBA)
partition of 2097Mb (/dev/hda2).  I wrote the partition table and
rebooted with the NT Server 4 CDROM.  Setup this time detected /dev/hda1
correctly as a FAT partition (since its size <2048Mb) and saw the second
partition (/dev/hda2, size 2097Mb) as "Unformatted or damaged".  NT
Setup successfully formatted the partition as FAT, using 64Kb clusters,
and I terminated the setup following that.

I would expect no problems subsequently booting either of the tested
partitions to NT, because both of the partitions start less than 4096Mb
into the hard disk.  Only if an NT partition is created beyond this
limit (because of MSDOS using a 16-bit filesystem) is it rendered
inaccessible from setup (although creating a new partition beyond this
limit using Disk Administrator within NT is no problem).

HTH

Alan.


--
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html

Reply via email to