Greetings, I'm not using RH 5.2; I do have 5.1. I can not tell you the differences file structure wise, but IMHO I found YaST easier to use for installation. I later used xrpm to install the WP 7.0 demo from the RedHat 5.1 apps CD in my SuSE partition. Regards, Bob Yates, Larry wrote: > > Hi, > > I've investigated both SuSE 5.3 and RedHat 5.2. > I know each distribution has its own set of tools, > but what particularly make SuSE vs RedHat? > > What are the internal differences? > > Do they depend on their own specific directory > structures? > If so, how do they differ? > How compatible are they? > > For instance, LILO works OK with RedHat, but SuSE's LILO emits > error 0X01's. The LILO.CONF's are identical and the kernal placement > is identical. Why can't the same lilo.conf work for either distro? > LILO itself is the same version... > > Thanks, > -Larry > - > To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e > Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the > archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html - To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
