You are right! For the reason the size of the sym-link file
is the size of either source file name or (source file name + absolute
path upto the file).
sudheer
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Herbert Stocker HSH[1126] wrote:
>
>
>
> What you said about soft links is correct. They can be compared to Windows
> shortcuts. But the difference is, that soft links are something, the
> operating system understands, and therefore every program works with it
> and not only the windows explorer. And a soft link only contains the file
> name of the target, but no icon info, or such things.
>
>
>
> Hell
>
>
> --
> hell (Herbert Stocker)
> :
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ Hell is also \
> http://hell.hsh.stusta.mhn.de \ my NickName \
> goto:D->MUC->StuSta->HSH[1126] \ in RealLive. \�
> :
>
> --
> To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
> Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
> archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
>
--
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
