Michael Merritt wrote:
>
> I found Jerry's statement humourous, though I do agree with MH: Flight
> Sim (I still have ver. 5.1) is a very good program. I've never upgrade
> to FS'98, since it is Windows-based, and I've never had good luck with
> Windows-based programs. I think that the DOS-based older versions are
> much better. I've enjoyed many hours of flying. Perhaps the post was
> off-topic, but I intended it as more "general-computing" related rather
> than MS-bashing.
That's what made the F16 fs from Holobyte Spectrum so stable. You had
to boot DOS with pharlap memory mangement. You weren't running windows
(not even 3.11) so you didn't have to worry about Windows crashing. I
don't remember my F16 DOS based fs ever crashing. Now, my copy of
Windows fs is another matter.
>
> Unrelated, doesn't the ARMY or NAVY one use a customized DOOM for combat
> training?
>
That's what I've heard.
--
JLK
Linux, because it's STABLE, the source code is included, the price is
right.
--
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
