> > This is just my opinion, I had to recompile my kernel under SuSE 6 to > include ppp support as a module. I actually think this in the end was a > good thing, the making of the kernel went really smoothly and I felt > like I had actually learned more about Linux, which is all good. > However, I do think it's a daunting task, and especialy if you've onl;y > ever used windows, well its kind of hardcore. I really think that ppp > should be a loadable module by DEFAULT in the SuSE package. I think it > would save some time and make the experience easier and nicer for > newcomers, and well what harm could it do? At most, someone might > rebuild the kernel excluding ppp as a module but I think that the > benefit for newcomers would be worth it. I really think SuSE should be > ppp ready put of the box. I totaly agree WHY... In Gods name would one not want ppp? Im still using 5.3 and would be curious as to WHAT is standard in the kernal. Id really like to hear the logic as to why ppp isnt included in the stock SuSE kernal. LenZ.... Hubert???? leme know when you included ppp and Ill consider a new SuSe distro. This looks to me like any new user who wants to try SuSE and getonline need to compile a kernal--- not very "user friendly" Till then Ive adapted quite nicely to 5.3 rob Linux Home Page http://www.connix.com/~dizzy73/LBM.htm S.u.S.E Linux 5.3 -- To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
