On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 06:34:00PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > I'd prefer not to apply this. It is better to just fix the kernel. > Whitelist is for video problems, not for random kernel bugs.
I agree, I'm not about to switch to a 32-bit kernel. But giving a warning like this could save people a lot of time. The user can still use -f if she wants. Couldn't you also say the same thing about NOFB? The fact that X works after s2ram and fb doesn't indicates it's a kernel framebuffer bug, right? Why is it s2ram's job to work around kernel framebuffer bugs, but not kernel amd64 bugs? I'm wondering if this is a problem related to running the video BIOS in a 64-bit kernel. Isn't the bios we're running just some 32-bit x86 instructions read straight out of the video ROM? I also wonder if 's2ram -s' would work better than '-p' if I fix the segfault... Jason Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
