On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:52:37 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 12 May 2007 22:18, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > OK, it turns out that my last patch for adding comments to usage had a > > horrible bug. Although (struct option_descr) would yield a (struct option), > > as anticipated, the increment of the pointers of these structs ofcourse > > wouldn't... > > > > Anyway the patch below fixes this, although also in a bit hackish way. > > usage() expects an \0 in the option.name string, and after that a comment. > > Like this: > > > > "help\0this text" > > Hmm, couldn't we use a separate array of strings for that? Yes, but I thought this was nice and compact;) Anyway, after Pavel's OK, I committed it. I can change it of course if you insist... grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
