On Thu, 31 May 2007 18:24:43 +0200 Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > the first hunk fixes s2ram -n, without it does not print what hacks would > actually be applied. > > The other hunks let s2ram complain louder about machines that are still > UNSURE. The fedora guys made pretty bad experiences with entries marked > UNSURE and we actually seldom get reports to confirm those, since s2ram > is quite silent about this flag. I changed that. Now it also complains > during a plain "s2ram" call, even though it will probably just work. > > I will need to move s2ram_check() before machine_known() to fix the > "implicit declaration"-warning, but i'll do that separately to not > obfuscate the patch. > > Any objections? Nope grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
