On Friday, 3 August 2007 18:22, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please dig in the list archives. I don't remember at the moment, but it's > > needed for something important. > > > > Alternatively, you can remove it and see what breaks. ;-) > > > > Greetings, > > Rafael > > Well bellow is the document of addition.
Thanks. > I am for removing it and fix it right when someone have an issue with it. What exactly is wrong with it? Greetings, Rafael > --- > > Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] read-ahead in resume > From: Michal Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 2006-04-11 23:01 > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday 12 April 2006 00:25, Michal Schmidt wrote: > >> I'm attaching a patch which makes resume.c explicitly initiate > >> asynchronous read-ahead on the image in fill_pages(). > > > > Is the _GNU_SOURCE absolutely necessary? > > It's not. The minimum to get the declarations for both posix_fadvise() > and syscall() seems to be: > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 600 > #define _BSD_SOURCE 1 > > -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel