On Friday, 3 August 2007 18:22, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please dig in the list archives.  I don't remember at the moment, but it's
> > needed for something important.
> >
> > Alternatively, you can remove it and see what breaks. ;-)
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Rafael
> 
> Well bellow is the document of addition.

Thanks.

> I am for removing it and fix it right when someone have an issue with it.

What exactly is wrong with it?

Greetings,
Rafael


> ---
> 
> Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] read-ahead in resume
> From: Michal Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 2006-04-11 23:01
> 
>    Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>  > On Wednesday 12 April 2006 00:25, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>  >> I'm attaching a patch which makes resume.c explicitly initiate
>  >> asynchronous read-ahead on the image in fill_pages().
>  >
>  > Is the _GNU_SOURCE absolutely necessary?
> 
>  It's not. The minimum to get the declarations for both posix_fadvise()
>  and syscall() seems to be:
>  #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 600
>  #define _BSD_SOURCE 1
> 
> 

-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel

Reply via email to