http://inq.philly.com:80/content/inquirer/2001/08/17/national/POLLUTE17.htm

Friday, August 17, 2001

Pollution deadlier than traffic crashes, researchers say

They estimated thousands could be saved if just four cities cleaned 
their air. Others said such a direct link was unproven.

By Paul Recer
ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON - More people are being killed by pollution from cars, 
trucks and other sources than by traffic crashes, researchers 
estimate in a report that says cleaning up would prolong the lives of 
thousands of people.

The researchers, in a study in the journal Science, said that cutting 
greenhouse gases in just four major cities - Sao Paulo, Brazil; 
Mexico City; Santiago, Chile; and New York City - could save 64,000 
lives over the next 20 years.

Greenhouse gases, mainly carbon dioxide or ozone, are those 
pollutants that tend to trap the sun's heat in the atmosphere or to 
affect solar radiation.

The gases have been blamed for causing global warming, but the 
study's lead author, Devra Lee Davis, a professor at Carnegie Mellon 
University's Heinz School in Pittsburgh, said the effects were not 
just long term.

"The message in our study is that there are real and immediate health 
benefits" in reducing greenhouse gases, she said. She said that 
burning fossil fuels, such as gasoline in cars or coal in power 
plants, can create air pollutants such as ozone, airborne particles 
small enough to be inhaled, carbon dioxide and other gases. The 
pollutants, Davis said, can cause people to die prematurely from 
asthma, breathing disorders and heart disease.

"It is our best estimate that more people are being killed by air 
pollution . . . than from traffic crashes," Davis said. "There are 
more than a thousand studies from 20 countries all showing that you 
can predict a certain death rate based on the amount of pollution."

Some experts say that the direct connection between air pollution and 
death is not that clear, even in cities.

Russell V. Luepker, a cardiologist and professor at the University of 
Minnesota, said that air pollution was not recognized as a 
significant cause of heart disease in the United States.

"It is not a major factor in developing heart disease, but it does 
play a role in acute episodes that can kill you," said Luepker, an 
expert designated by the American Heart Association as a spokesman. 
"More people either come to emergency rooms or die of heart disease 
during pollution episodes," but the pollution did not start the 
disease, he said.

Marian Frieri, a professor of medicine and an asthma expert at State 
University of New York at Stony Brook, said air pollution can 
contribute to asthma inflammation but is only one factor on top of 
another condition.

Davis and four coauthors said that adopting greenhouse-gas abatement 
technologies now available could prevent thousands of cases of 
chronic bronchitis and save millions of days of restricted or lost 
work.

Davis said although the study concentrated on just four cities, the 
conclusions probably could be applied to cities worldwide.

The data are consistent with a World Health Organization study that 
estimated that air pollution would cause about eight million deaths 
worldwide by 2020, she said.

Dr. Jonathan Patz of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public 
Health said the study by Davis and her coauthors "shows that there 
are significant health benefits to be had from reducing emissions 
from the burning of fossil fuels."

Carbon dioxide and other gases from the burning of coal and oil have 
been blamed by many researchers for climate warming. Some predict 
long-term global effects, including rising sea levels and recurring 
weather extremes.



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address. 
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to