Oh you would like that wouldn't you. Problem is you failed to completly read the article. I read it on msn.com hm or was it yahoo.. anyway it was in a lead container hidden under the seat of a taxi. If the government was going to pull something like that they would not be so stupid. The CIA has experts that know how that stuff works alot better then you or me I would wager. Besides we know government well enough to know that if they were involved they would most likly stage it as a demonstration and set it up like the "bad" guys didnt know how to handle it by haveing it leak and kill a bunch of "bad" guys and or innocents.
Now if you had said that the cab driver was a member of biofuels group and was working on a way to power his vehicle with enriched uranium then I might have believed. LOL Besides there is already enough evidence in just his character profile to know that he is trying to do it. This guy likes to kill people and preferably not one or two at a time. His idea of an afternoon of fun is to kill a whole family at least. maybe even part of his own. No evidence of any guilt or a real reason necessary. Read the human rights reports that have come out of that area. statements from the few people who have escaped over the last 12 years or so. Not a guy I would want to even know. Bryan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc de Piolenc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Biofuel List" <biofuel@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 1:42 AM Subject: [biofuel] The BBC has been fooled by a CIA set up...NOT > The BBC has been fooled by a CIA set up > > > "I have just posted this on your forum, BBC Talking Point and I doubt > whether it will be printed as it would be an embarrassment; > Was the "Enriched uranium" found in Turkey real or was it a part of a > ploy > to lend credence to claims that Iraq is building an atomic bomb? > Would 15 Kilograms of weapons grade uranium be put on show and be > photographed by journalists when the radiation from it would not only be > deadly but would fog photographic films and cause wonderful sparklies in > a > digital camera due to the radiation exiting the sensor and corrupting > the > memory, CMOS devices in all modern equipment are very susceptible to > radiation! > Why not ask an expert what would happen to anybody who was close to that > much enriched uranium!" > > Fissionables are not highly radioactive (nuclear reactors would not be > controllable if they were), and it is perfectly possible and safe to > stand at a reasonable distance from highly enriched uranium. Spontaneous > radioactivity is stronger in a lump of plutonium because of inevitable > contamination by a radioactive isotope of that metal, but even that > would be tolerable at a distance of a few meters. > > Of course, the whole show could still be a setup, but the fact that > journalists were able to take pictures without getting radiation > sickness proves nothing. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Plan to Sell a Home? http://us.click.yahoo.com/J2SnNA/y.lEAA/MVfIAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
