>--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:40:02 -0000, "motie_d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Motie, may I suggest the following? > > > > 1. It would be a nice idea to show some consideration to people >(like me) with flaky Internet connections - like whetting the URL, >whether the matter has already been discussed, if so what is the >prevailing viewpoint, and what additional facets of the 'truth' that >the article brings about. > > > > > > > >My apologies for not doing so. I am still highly pressed for time by >matters beyond my control, and can't give the proper time to compose >adequate responses. For now, I'll simply have to concede to the >Sierra Club's perverted viewpoint, and let the matter drop. > >Motie
The views of Ronald Bailey and Reason Magazine, et al, are far more perverted and dishonest than anything the Sierra Club does. And, please, I'm very much on record here and elsewhere as NOT liking or defending the Sierra Club. Keith Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
