>First and foremost, in my view, the author made more than one suggestion, not >just one suggestion, for addressing the oil dependency problem. > >He did not buy into the view that there is one 'ANSWER' and that all debate >should end about anything and everything except for his pet 'ANSWER'. This, I >think, was unusual and good.
Further commenting on this point..., the Bush plan to push for the H2 world economy, while interesting, amounts somewhat to this putting-too-many-eggs-in-one basket idea. I'm not sure that people who believe in the mechanisms of the free market would presume to know which technology should win out, over other worthy contenders. I thought that a principle of the marketplace was that it can help you understand.... it can give you feedback on the many difficult-to-understand-up-front aspects of various competing technologies and supplies. By focusing on one single idea, the Bush Administration may be advocating an idea that is worth pursuing but may also be casting aside wortwhile principles we're told they advocated. I sure would like to see increased competition in the fuel and auto propulsion industries. I'm not clear how that results from a gung-ho semi-funding of focused H2 research. Well, that's my thought for now, subject to revision. Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
