A representative went on to say: "biofuels? You mean wood?" Of course, the $1B couldn't be better spent on something like, say: SOLAR or WIND power.
Seriously, they want to trap the carbon dioxide that comes out, and do WHAT with it. Convert it to carbon and release the oxygen? The car that runs on water comes to mind, with the only by-product being water. --- Martin Klingensmith nnytech.net infoarchive.net > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:40 PM > To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com > Cc: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [biofuel] U.S. Seeking Cleaner Model of Coal Plant > > http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/28/science/28COAL.html > > U.S. Seeking Cleaner Model of Coal Plant > By ANDREW C. REVKIN > > The Energy Department yesterday announced plans to build an > experimental power plant within 10 years that runs on coal but emits > no carbon dioxide, the heat-trapping greenhouse gas that makes coal > plants major contributors to global warming. > > The project, called FutureGen, is considered a first step toward > creating a generation of coal-fueled power plants that emit no > greenhouse gases and cost no more than 10 percent extra to run, > department officials said. > Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
