> It seems to me that burning biomass as a biofuel should be more efficient as > it doesn't have to be fermented, or pressed, or anything much. Of course, > liquid fuels have their place as a transport fuel, but for stationary power, > I would guess that biomass would have the advantage of less need for > manipulation.
I wonder why they do not make biogas out of it instead of burning it directly? That would have the advantage that you could use the remaining slurry as fertiliser/compost. Arno ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
