<x-charset ISO-8859-1>http://www.nature.com/nsu/040202/040202-13.html

Diesel makes for more smog
The 'green' fuel emits less carbon dioxide but could still boost pollution.

6 February 2004

MARK PEPLOW

Widespread use of diesel engines, often thought of as 'greener' than 
the petrol alternatives, would make the air smoggier, according to 
new research.

Diesels typically emit less carbon dioxide than petrol (gasoline) 
vehicles, reducing their contribution to global warming. But that 
doesn't necessarily make diesel an environmentally friendly 
alternative, says Mark Jacobson, who models atmospheric pollution at 
Stanford University in California. Diesels produce a larger amount of 
nitrogen oxides than petrol-engined cars, he points out. And that can 
contribute to smog.

Smog is a complex soup of pollutants formed in the atmosphere from 
chemical reactions triggered by sunlight. Its main constituent is 
ground-level ozone, which is produced when hydrocarbons and nitrogen 
oxides from vehicle fumes react together. In the upper atmosphere, 
ozone shields us from harmful ultraviolet rays. But ground-level 
ozone is bad news.

"If you're pushing nitrogen oxides out of the tailpipe, you might as 
well be pushing out ozone," says Jacobson.

The increase in smog could contribute to health problems. "Smog is 
not good for humans," says Roy Harrison of Birmingham University, a 
UK government adviser on air pollution. "It reduces lung function, 
increases mortality rates, and increases hospital admissions for 
repiratory diseases."

Less smoggy in LA

Jacobson used a computer model of atmosphere quality to see what 
would happen if every vehicle in the United States ran on diesel. He 
found that smog levels increased significantly over most of the 
country1. In most areas, it was enough to push air quality from 
"moderate" to "very unhealthy", according to standards defined by the 
Environmental Protection Agency.

The southeast United States was the region hardest hit, probably 
because the air in this area is rich in hydrocarbons produced by 
plant life. That extra dose of hydrocarbons can mix with nitrogen 
oxides from diesel cars, making for worse smog, says Jacobson.

Diesel use caused a decrease in smog in only a few areas - mostly 
where there aren't any trees. Ironically, this includes Los Angeles, 
currently one of the smoggiest cities in the United States.

Pollution traps

Diesel engines also produce more particulate matter than 
petrol-fuelled cars. These particles of soot can exacerbate health 
problems such as asthma and can contribute to global warming2.

New diesel car tailpipes are fitted with filters that trap both 
particulate matter and nitrogen oxide fumes. But these don't 
necessarily cure the problem, says Jacobson. "You have a trade-off - 
a particle trap reduces the efficiency of the nitrogen oxide filter, 
and vice versa," he says. According to Jacobson, cars fitted with 
filters still emit more nitrogen oxide than petrol vehicles.

Other technological fixes are being developed to reduce smog, 
including a paint that absorbs nitrogen oxides that is about to go on 
sale in Europe. The material, called Ecopaint, locks nitrogen oxides 
up as calcium nitrate, preventing it from reacting with hydrocarbons 
in the air.

But Jacobson argues that until such fixes can be put in place, 
current policies in the United States wrongly favour diesel as an 
environmentally friendly choice. "The latest energy bill gives 
diesels the same status as 'green' cars in terms of financial 
incentives," he points out.

While Jacobson admits that no one is seriously considering converting 
all the cars in the United States to diesel, he says that his model 
helps to prove a point - that diesel isn't necessarily a better 
option for the environment.

References


1.      Jacobsen, M. Z. The effects on photochemical smog of 
converting the U.S. fleet of gasoline behicles to modern diesel 
vehicles. Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L02116, 
doi:10.1029/2003GL018448 (2004). |Article|
2.      Jacobsen, M. Z. Control of fossil-fuel particulate black 
carbon and organic matter, possibly the most effective method of 
slowing global warming. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 4410, 
doi:10.1029/2001JD001376 (2004). |Article|

…?Nature News Service / Macmillan Magazines Ltd 2004


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


</x-charset>

Reply via email to