Post In-line for Context

When you quote, you're doing it to provide context. Requiring your readers to scroll down and then back, repeatedly (as they attempt to figure out what the heck you're talking about), is a rather difficult way for you to make the context available. Providing the context up-front will get you better results.

There's no way to build a threaded discussion with top-posting. Top-posting severely inhibits others from understanding the conversation, because the context of the conversation is out of order, as in broken.

It is far easier for your recipients to follow the ongoing conversation in a message that uses quotes in-line like this:

         > Quote of one point

         Your response

         > Quote of another point

         Your response to the second point

than it is for your readers to follow along if you use top-posting like this (thanks to Adam Brower by way of Patricia Shaffer):

         Oh! Now it makes sense to me. Okay! No more
         top-posting for me!

         > It's annoying because it reverses the normal
         > order of conversation. In fact, many people
         > ignore top-posted messages.

         > > What's so wrong with that?

         > > > That's posting your response before
         > > > the message you're quoting.

         > > > > People keep bugging me about
         > > > > "top-posting." What does that mean?

or as in this very touching example (from Clifton Sharp):

         "I'll see you at Linda's wedding."
         "Well, see ya soon."
         "Congratulations!"
         "Ten thousand a year."
         "How much?"
         "Got a really big raise this time."
         "Sorry to hear it. How's the job?"
         "She's not feeling well. Flu, I think."
         "Same as ever. How's yours?"
         "How's your wife?"
         "They painted her purple. They should call her the Prune Fart now."
         "Good. Did you hear what Martin and Sheila did to the Sea Breeze?"
         "Good, and you?"
         "Bill! How the heck are you?"

Top-posting makes your message incomprehensible to many of your readers. In normal conversation, after all, you don't answer to something that has not yet been said. Replying at the top confuses your readers, making any point you're trying to get across very unclear without them scrolling down and back repeatedly, searching to re-integrate context. That extra, wholly unnecessary work leads to reader irritation, or worse, to readers just not bothering with your words at all.

Since your object is to get your message across, help your readers follow by placing your words in context, not prior to the context. Doing otherwise, forcing your readers to go to extra work unnecessarily, is often irritating, sometimes interpreted as insulting, or in severe cases taken as attempt by you to show your "power". Any way you cut that, delivering your words in an hard to read manner doesn't help your case. Instead, post in-line to preserve context and respect your readers.

_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Reply via email to