Yes, I am actually hoping to put a couple of fusion units together since I can't find a source of dilithium crystals on this remote forgotten outpost. Would you accept half a pound of pure unobtanium as payment? :) Kirk
Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Common sense is actually quite uncommon in some circles. Most of the >"free" energy people I have talked with seem to have a large >emotional investment in their paradigm, be it concern about energy >shortage to perceiving themselves as victims of a cabal. > >Your points are valid but I don't think the average Lutec fan will >understand you. > >Great invention Keith. Will a Pepsi bottle work just as well? LOL! No, Kirk, it has to be a Dr Pepsi bottle. Do I see you getting out your chequebook? :-) regards Keith >:) >Kirk > >Jurie Vorster wrote: >Not an expert in any particular field but common sense and a bit of >logic tells me... > >1) The "how-it-works" stuff claims that the *permanent* magnet provides >energy in keeping the object suspended from the roof equating to a >electromagnet holding it up there but expending energy instead. WELL, >how would LUTEC explain the energy content of PERMANENT GLUE holding up >the object... or what about hanging it from a PERMANENT HOOK that is >screwed into the ceiling? > >2) In the device, the magnets moves towards the steel thus giving >inertial energy to the armature... then a counter electromagnetic field >is applied to "neutralise" the magnetic properties of the steel thus >allowing the permanent magnets to rotate past freely. This >"neutralising" pulse needs to be long enough so that the next "step" can >initiate or until the "back-step" that will slow down the magnets (thus >reducing its inertial energy) pull is less than the "forward-step" pull. > >AT BEST, the amount of energy to "neutralise" the steel magnetic effect >will equal the amount of inertial energy generated by the pull of the >magnets towards the steel... no GAIN. Thus there will be only loss of >total energy and the efficiency of the "smoothing" effect as per patent >description will be related to the losses in the electronics to control >the "neutralising" field coils and mechanical resistance etc... > >FUTURE DEVELOMENTS >My theory is that if someone can find a MATERIAL that cuts or shield a >magnetic field in "line-of-sight" to achieve the "neutralising" effect >proposed by the LUTEC device creator, can such a device be possible. No >such material exists to my knowledge as the magnetic field would curl >around the "shield" and still slow down the permanent magnets. > >Some savvy boffin may be able to come up with such a material that could >even be made to mechanically rotate into and out of the "line-of-sight" >with the permanent magnets... not unlike these film-strip movie >projectors synchronises field frames onto the viewing screen. > >My longwinded two cents worth. > >Can we now get back to Bio Diesel!?!? > >Jurie. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Chris >Sent: 03 April 2005 03:07 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Biofuel] The Lutec over unity device > >OK Keith, be nice. > > > >I've developed this wonderful technique of producing cold > > fusion in a Dr Pepper bottle, just add the secret ingredients and > > shake it 3.5 times... Interested? > > > > Keith --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Better first dates. More second dates. Yahoo! Personals _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
