Off topic, that's correct.
No it's not. See List rules: http://wwia.org/pipermail/biofuel/Week-of-Mon-20040906/000005.html
This particular "breakthrough" is not what it seems, i.e. it is not suitable for energy production.
Neither are ethanol fuel cells, yet, but that's also not off-topic. Best wshes Keith Addison Journey to Forever KYOTO Pref., Japan http://journeytoforever.org/ Biofuel list owner
In concept perchance interesting. If this was Nuclear fusion, the real thing, oil stocks would have plummeted, and it would be all over the news. End of story. R.I.P. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Redler Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: Nuclear Fusion Achieved in Los Angeles! ...good to know. Thanks, Mike Hakan Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mike, Why should it be off topic? If it is interesting is up to the reader, I read it, even if I am going to be long gone before it is a "ready for use" technology. Hakan At 03:12 PM 4/28/2005, you wrote: >Hey, > >I just wanted to say that I know that nuclear fusion is off topic. It's >not biofuel and is another invitation for big business to monopolize power >generation. > >I was purely interested in the science and I thought you might be too. >This has been a good example of a technology that looks fairly simple as a >concept, but has not been achievable in practice. IMHO, >biofuelers/conservationists/environmentalists, etc. might want to be both >curious and weary of this potential energy source. > >Mike
_______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
